This raises an emotional question: "Why?" Few people ask the question "Why does God choose people?" though we should. More often, we want to know why God doesn't choose others. Don't the Scriptures say that God so loved the world [John 3:16] and that God doesn't want anyone to perish but wishes for all to come to repentance [1 Peter 3:9]? Why would God leave anyone behind?
Three reasons are worthy of our consideration:
ELECTION ELEVATES GRACE.
When salvation is put squarely in the hands of God, there is no room left for personal pride. Paul conceded that his only boasting was in the cross of Jesus, not in any human effort [Galatians 6:14]. If salvation depended on any human work---human ingenuity, human intellect, human will---the cross of Jesus would be diminished in its necessity [1 Corinthians 1:17].
But, the cross, wasn't just an extra "boost" to help mostly-competent people bridge a little gap. The cross did 100% for us what we were 100% unable to do. Thus election reveals the grace of God. The fact that God chooses to save some magnifies the greatness of His kindness and grace in salvation. If God didn't elect some, none would ever be saved.
ELECTION AMPLIFIES JUSTICE.
But, the cross, wasn't just an extra "boost" to help mostly-competent people bridge a little gap. The cross did 100% for us what we were 100% unable to do. Thus election reveals the grace of God. The fact that God chooses to save some magnifies the greatness of His kindness and grace in salvation. If God didn't elect some, none would ever be saved.
ELECTION AMPLIFIES JUSTICE.
Romans 9 provides one of the most helpful insights to God's purposes in election:
"What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath–prepared for destruction? What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory– even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles?" [Romans 9:22-24]
This is an interesting argument that is sure to raise the eyebrows of some. Paul highlights the prerogative of God to execute His wrath. Instead, God chooses to save some, in order to "show His wrath and make His power known" [v. 22]. I take this to mean that God chooses not to save some in order to amplify His justice among the redeemed.
Before we cry "foul," we must remember that justice is one of God's attributes. And, just as God wishes to make His love, mercy, power, wisdom, holiness and beauty known, He also wishes to make His jealousy, justice and wrath known. When we ask, "How could a loving God ever send someone to hell?" we prove that we have a limited view of God. God doesn't condemn people because of a lack of love, but out of a fullness of justice. And, His decision to elect is a demonstration of this justice.
ELECTION AFFIRMS SOVEREIGNTY
"What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath–prepared for destruction? What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory– even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles?" [Romans 9:22-24]
This is an interesting argument that is sure to raise the eyebrows of some. Paul highlights the prerogative of God to execute His wrath. Instead, God chooses to save some, in order to "show His wrath and make His power known" [v. 22]. I take this to mean that God chooses not to save some in order to amplify His justice among the redeemed.
Before we cry "foul," we must remember that justice is one of God's attributes. And, just as God wishes to make His love, mercy, power, wisdom, holiness and beauty known, He also wishes to make His jealousy, justice and wrath known. When we ask, "How could a loving God ever send someone to hell?" we prove that we have a limited view of God. God doesn't condemn people because of a lack of love, but out of a fullness of justice. And, His decision to elect is a demonstration of this justice.
ELECTION AFFIRMS SOVEREIGNTY
Often, in the election discussion, focus is on why God doesn't save all people. In fact, we should wonder why God saves any people. No one deserves to be saved. All are justly condemned because of sin. Therefore, God's decision to save whomever He may ultimately points to His sovereignty. God answers to no one. The potter has the right to use the clay however He wishes [Romans 9:21].
So, we could try to figure out the "why" of election. Or, like some, unable to come up with a satisfactory reason, we could just dismiss it. But, perhaps God never intended for us to tie up the loose theological ends. Perhaps God prefers the emotional dissonance. Because, when we can't figure things out, all we're left with is faith. Election presents an opportunity for us to affirm God's sovereignty over all things and trust Him when answers don't make immediate sense.
So, we could try to figure out the "why" of election. Or, like some, unable to come up with a satisfactory reason, we could just dismiss it. But, perhaps God never intended for us to tie up the loose theological ends. Perhaps God prefers the emotional dissonance. Because, when we can't figure things out, all we're left with is faith. Election presents an opportunity for us to affirm God's sovereignty over all things and trust Him when answers don't make immediate sense.
8 comments:
Ya, good post. Just yesterday my 10 year old asked, "Why doesn't God save everyone?" I touched on what you just said and then said, "A better question would be, "Why does He save anyone?""
Thanks for you thoughts. See you There!
Man has had free will from the start. To choose the path he will take. If god has pre-selected some then Christ only died for them and not all. Wittnessing would be meaningless since God has already selected them. I think theres a differance in God knowing who will be saved and selecting who to save.
God will act first on the heart, but man must act also.I will always believe that salvation is a free gift to all who choose it.
Its a great topic and greater minds then mine have debated it, and still do. no matter if God has selected me or moved my heart to choose Him, I am greatful to be his. For I willfully choose Him, Serve Him and Love Him.John 3:16
says "Whoever Believes " not whoever God selects.
Great Blog,Love the deep stuff !
Anonymous,
Thanks for taking time to comment. I agree that this has been a hotly debated topic and there are greater minds that both of ours (!) to deal with it. However, I'd like for you to consider two points that you made--2 points that are widely held, but not in line with Scripture.
First, you mention that God "knows" who will be saved, but does not "select" who will be saved. Many people prefer this definition to the word "predestination" (Romans 8:29-30; Ephesians 1:5, 11). This is known as "prescience"---Because He's all knowing, God sees beforehand who will repent and chooses them to be saved. However, this is not what predestination means. The Greek word actually means to pre-select. So, to prefer "knowing" over "selecting" is to miss the definition of the biblical term.
Second, you mention "free will." While this concept is widely taught, and we expect to be free, and we feel like we're free....we're not. The Bible states that we are "slaves to sin" (Romans 6) and "dead in our tresspasses and sins (Ephesians 2). In fact, Paul writes that the reason Christ came was to "set us free"--something He wouldn't have to do if we had free wills already. I have explained this before using the picture of a prisoner: Is a man who is in jail, free? Some might answer "no." But, he IS free to do whatever he wants...within his confines, of course. His freedom is limited by his circumstances. Human beings ARE free, but only as much as their sin nature permits them. And, sin enslaves us and puts us to death so that we cannot choose God (see Romans 3:10-12).
What do you think?
Thanks for your reply again.So many time in Gods word we see that salvation came to those and ALL who accepted Christ.A free gift to all who confess with their mouth and believe in their hearts that Jesus is Lord. Romans 10 9&10
Tho God acts first on the heart it would seem man also must act one way or the other. Accept or reject.
I agree that man is like the prisoner in jail because of his sin, yet once the door is opened it would seem he must choose to stay where he is at or walk through the door. in this, God opens the doorway to salvation and one must choose to go through it or not. I am thankful for you willingness to share your views on this as it just so happened it has been coming up alot with some freinds of mine and I never understood it and still need to look into it more.I know Gods ways are way above ours. I just not sure if I would ever believe that God pre-selected some and not other. That salvation is a free gift to ALL who want it. I promise I will take time to look into futher tho. In closing I always respect your wisdom,heart for God and you love for all. your a great pastor and teacher and I miss you here in Minnesota. Thanks for moving my heart to look deeper into Gods word. Yours in Christ.
Rick
Thanks, I will bookmark this page and use it... really very help full blog.
Live church services
Sounds like you are preparing thoughts around a sermon on this topic! I always think of two points about Election from both sides:
1) Understanding or believeing in Election has no signifigance in one's salvation. Many have died never understanding or having even heard of the idea. At times I feel the discussion gets used more to satisfy a human desire of self-importance, to be puffed up with knowledge, or to define the unexplainable rather than our identity in Christ.
2) The other is what is mentioned in the comments is that a belief in Election means that witnessing would be meaningless since God has already "selected" who will be saved. One could feel that way, but we are not GOD and we have no idea who has been "selected" so our call to witness is the same as stated over and over again in scripture. Part of His sovereignty may very well be using "us" to achieve his purposes.
Hello Pastor David,
Thank you as always for your wonderful blog! :-) I have a question about a book that I recently heard which was recommended by Chip Ingram on this topic. It's called "Chosen But Free" by Norman Geisler. Have you read this or agree with his book recommendation? Sorry in advance if I missed seeing any resource you may have suggested for further research. With much gratitude for how you shepherd God's church with excellence! :-)
At Anonymous (2):
On your second point - if we believe in Election/Predestination we won't witness --- This is not necessarily the case - we don't witness anyway in some cases because of disobedience. If you do witness to "The Faith" regularly, you will do it even more with more freedom once you believe in Election! You will then realize that it totally doesn't depend on you! It is all up to God, it doesn't matter if you "don't quite say it right" to that one guy, his eternal destiny does not depend on you any more than yours did on him. It all depends on God - and you get to participate...
As to the claim in Anon. (1) that salvation is free to all who will accept - again this is quite true and inline with the thoughts on Election... the difference is that only the elect are set free (made alive) and able to accept it... Furthermore, there is an idea in there that anyone God calls will undisputedly come to him, some have called this concept "irresistible grace"... some have argued with that, but from my standpoint, who in their "right mind" i.e. those who truly realize their position before God without Jesus' payment on their behalf would continue to reject God and a restored relationship with him? One who truly realizes that he has been made alive and set free would not only "not" reject Jesus, but would run to him as fast as possible to be "covered by his blood" (as the saying goes) as a payment before God for the sins and wages that he has earned while rejecting God up to that point... anyway I am rambling now -
On another note, I had a friend in college who led a Bible study for students. He was very focused on quality over quantity. He told me once, that whenever his study got too big where he didn't feel he could invest good quality into the guys he was teaching, he would break out the sovereignty of God lesson set and if that didn't drive enough people away, he'd start teaching on spiritual gifts and tongues... (from a quite conservative way). Then he'd go back to discipleship and "normal" Christian living type studies.
Thanks Pastor for being brave enough to go into this on your blog (and maybe in service).
MB
Post a Comment